Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Dean's Election '08 LiveBlog

">

Take a look! Myself and others may just contribute too...

Monday, November 03, 2008

What does the Brand/Ross/Sachs affair mean for BBC comedy?

(written for TVScoop.tv)

As Russell Brand cheekily opened his weekly Guardian column - ostensibly about football, though we all know what he's really referring to: "What a palaver". I won't comment on the original incident; lord knows there's been enough comment already without me adding to it (and in any case, it seems that your opinion is immediately invalidated in you are a fan of Brand and/or Ross. Ahem. I’m neutral on the subject, as you can tell.) No, rather than picking over the original phone calls, it is certainly worth considering what the ensuing furore means for comedy on the BBC. Is it all Last Of The Summer Wine and After You’ve Gone from here on in?

Well, as Ian Hislop said on Have I Got News For You last Friday night, the BBC has something of a track record of going from keeping schtum and acting as if nothing has happened (I think he actually used the phrase “breathless arrogance”) to fawning lapdog in the wink of an eye, so it is certainly possible that Aunty will be now be checking up on her comedy performers and writers with an unprecedented vigour - and many would say that that’s a darn good thing.

And of course to a certain extent it is - the BBC does hold a special position thanks to the licence fee and sheer world standing, and so ridiculous lapses in editorial control are not acceptable. And after all, tighter controls in this particular instance would have meant that BBC Radio 2 could have held onto its (by all accounts hugely respected) controller, and one of its most innovative presenters - and this thoroughly bizarre, frenzied week might have been avoided completely.

But while editorial control is one thing, over-zealous censorship is something else entirely, and something to be wary of. As someone who is passionate about her comedy, and who looks to the BBC for breaking acts, intelligence, and something a bit different, I can’t help but be a little concerned that comedy on the Beeb is going to lose its teeth.

It’s clear where the immediate danger lies. Shows such as Mock The Week and Never Mind The Buzzcocks which rely on often acerbic comics will be watched over with a particularly keen eye, despite the fact that sailing close to the wind is precisely what makes them so entertaining to their (probably shared) audience. Editors and producers, you assume, will try to keep Frankie Boyle in particular on a rather short leash, especially as a comment he made about the Queen eighteen months ago, but repeated this week, has already been criticised by certain sectors of the press.

The BBC must remember, however, to assume some intelligence on the part of the audience. They must remember that we are just as able as before to pick up on subtlety, intent, irony, sarcasm and above all context when considering whether something is unacceptable or simply challenging. All of these things must be taken into account - comedy out of context loses 90% of its meaning.

This isn’t to say, of course, that all comedy needs to be cutting edge to be worthy - just look at Beautiful People for an example of a comedy which could easily be tweaked for a pre-watershed slot and yet in my opinion is one of the best shows airing at the moment. But balance is necessary, and not all comedy shown on the BBC can be of this type. It goes without saying that the genuinely offensive should be cut out at source, but the BBC needs to hold its nerve, otherwise it will find itself deserted by its top talent, and - perhaps most worryingly of all - mediocrity will rule.

Sunday, November 02, 2008

Some sane words on the Brand/Ross/Sachs affair...

India Knight in today's Sunday Times

I am utterly nonplussed by the Russell Brand-Jonathan Ross fallout. What’s with the insanely disproportionate reaction? Grovel a much-needed apology, by all means, then grovel some more, but why the need for ritual disembowelling?

Brand “resigns”; Ross is suspended without pay for three months; the controller Lesley Douglas, who is revered by her creative stable, falls on her sword; and Radio 2 self-harms in order to assuage 30,000 members of the public - a few streets’ worth - because two clever, talented men made a grotesquely tasteless joke, for which they apologised profusely - if late in the day.

The corporation’s desire to show moral backbone has left it looking spineless. The millions of viewers and listeners who didn’t complain are left deprived of the entertainment that they, too, pay their licence fee for. What on earth is going on?


She also goes on to say how Brand and Ross, while great entertainers, do have the "Achilles' heel", as she puts it, of treating women reductively, let's say. Well worth a read.

I'll be posting a comment on TVScoop tomorrow about what the whole affair means for comedy on the Beeb, so I'll cross-post here. Something to look forward to, eh? ;)